Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic
By R. Pohl. 2006
139 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ed6cfddd5e417d6d51c5d3243f9361f378a77b5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Economics and Econometrics
In General Decision Sciences
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- Daniel G. Goldstein
- Robin M. Hogarth
- Ralph Hertwig
- Arch G. Woodside
- A. Glöckner
- T. Betsch
- Peter M. Todd
Citations in the corpus
- Predicting Wimbledon 2005 tennis results by mere player name recognition (2007, unknown): “…claim that recognition is the only cue used in probabilistic inferences when applicable (Bröder & Eichler, 2006; Newell & Fernandez, 2006; Newell & Shanks, 2004; Pohl, 2006; Richter & Späth, 2006), all these studies show that people's inferences are heavily influenced by recognition information.”
- Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty (2008, unknown): “…Gigerenzer 2002 .80 90% Population of Swiss cities Pohl 2006, Exp. 1 and 2 .86 (Exp. 1) .72 (Exp. 2) 89% 75% Distance of Swiss cities from Interlaken Pohl 2006, Exp. 1 .51 54% Population of European cities Pohl 2006, Exp. 3 .89 (Italian) .82 (Belgian) 88% 89% Largest mountains, rivers, and…”
- Fast and frugal heuristics: Tools of social rationality. (2009, unknown): “Pohl, R. F. (2006). Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 251-271. Price, J. (2008). Parent-child quality time: Does birth order matter? Journal of Human Resources, 43, 240-265.”
- The recognition heuristic: A decade of research (2011, background): “This simplifying assumption has been criticized (e.g., Hilbig & Pohl, 2009).”
- Heuristic decision making. (2011, unknown): “Pohl (2006) reported that 89% of inferences accorded with the model in judgments of population, compared to only 54% in judgments of the distance.”
- Why Heuristics Work (2008, background): “For instance, the larger the recognition validity in a study, the larger the proportion of participants who follow the recognition heuristic (Pohl, 2006), and the larger the variability of cue validities, the larger the proportion of participants who follow the take-the-best heuristic (Rieskamp &…”
- Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious (2007, background): “See also Pohl, 2006.”