Pleasure and the good life
By F. Feldman. 2004
199 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ea16b7b3af6e650907bab2e27616bbae38eddd9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Panel on Measuring Subjective Well-Being in aPolicy-Rele Framework
- Division on Behavioral
- C. Mackie
- Jason R. Raibley
- Arthur A. Stone
- Nico Frijda
- Chris Heathwood
- Paul Dolan
Citations in the corpus
- Subjective Well-Being: Measuring Happiness, Suffering, and Other Dimensions of Experience (2014, background): “This is somewhat related to Fred Feldman’s attitudinal hedonism (Feldman, 2004).”
- Happiness is not Well-Being (2012, background): “These include versions of hedonism (Feldman 2004), desire-satisfactionism (Murphy 1999; Heathwood 2006; Lukas 2010), the Objective List Theory (Arneson 1999), aim-achievementism (Scanlon 1998; Keller 2009), developmentalism (Kraut 1979), the life-satisfaction theory (Sumner 1996), the…”
- Monism and Pluralism about Value (2015, background): “Velleman, J. (1991).”
- Life satisfaction, ethical reflection, and the science of happiness (2007, background): “Recent defenses of mental state theories of welfare, notably hedonism, include Crisp (forthcoming), Feldman (2004) and Silverstein (2000).”
- Emotion Experience and its Varieties (2009, background): “Extensive introspective research led to the conclusion that pleasure has no phenomenology (Arnold, 1960; Feldman, 2004): that research did not yield any description of pleasure other than the occasional mention of body feelings such as “bright pressure” (Arnold, 1960).”