The Mental Cutting Test "Schnitte" and the Picture Rotation Test-Two New Measures to Assess Spatial Ability

By Claudia M. Quaiser-Pohl. 2003

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geography, Planning and Development

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e9fe6447481e8d3d2588d9d980945eef6f1c4fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Tracy Logan
2. Thomas Lowrie
3. A. Ramful

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. A. Ramful
2. Thomas Lowrie
3. Tracy Logan

In Geography, Planning and Development

1. Thomas Lowrie
2. Tracy Logan
3. A. Ramful

Citations in the corpus

• Measurement of Spatial Ability: Construction and Validation of the Spatial Reasoning Instrument for Middle School Students (2017, methodology): “We also analyzed commonly used spatial reasoning instruments from the psychology and mathematics education literature such as the test batteries from Education Testing Services (Ekstrom et al., 1976), the Mental Rotations Test (Vandenberg & Kuse, 1978), Picture Rotation Test (Quaiser-Pohl, 2003), Mi”
• Gender differences in pre-adolescents’ mental-rotation performance: Do they depend on grade and stimulus type? (2011, unknown): “Support for this idea comes from Johnson and Meade (1987), who report a reliable male advantage from 10 years onwards, but not before, and from Quaiser-Pohl (2003), who tested 4–6-year-old preschoolers with the ‘‘Picture Rotation Test’’ and found no gender difference.”