Interests, institutions, and climate policy: Explaining the choice of policy instruments for the energy sector
By Llewelyn Hughes, Johannes Urpelainen. 2015
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e9de5424582c03d4ea4ff5830edca63fbe57b0a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- The political logics of clean energy transitions (2018, background): “47 Hughes and Urpelainen (2015). 48 Interview with senior political official, Oslo, 22 November 2013. 49 Tjernshaugen and Langhelle (2009). Interview with senior environmental NGO official, Oslo,”
- Institutions, Climate Change, and the Foundations of Long-Term Policymaking (2019, background): “…2019), the balance of political power between “green” (low carbon) and “brown” (carbon-intensive) sectors (Aklin & Urpelainen, 2013; Cheon & Urpelainen, 2013; Hughes & Urpelainen, 2015), veto points (Madden, 2014), and countries’ locations in international carbon supply chains (Harrison, 2015).”
- Beliefs about Climate Beliefs: The Importance of Second-Order Opinions for Climate Politics (2017, background): “…climate 16e.g.Tingley and Tomz 2013 17e.g. Bechtel and Scheve 2013 18IPCC 2014 19Hansen, Sato, and Ruedy 2012; Herring et al. 2014 20Druckman 2013; Hughes and Urpelainen 2015 21Erikson, Wright, and McIver 1993; Stimson, MacKuen, and Erikson 1995; Lax and Phillips 2012; Tausanovitch and Warshaw…”