Does Foreign Direct Investment Crowd Out Domestic Entrepreneurship?

By Koen De Backer, L. Sleuwaegen. 2002

405 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e8af9a9ce7f7f1b489aa9e0f4a1b27f84ee4447

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Dean Xu
2. Sea-Jin Chang
3. Qian Gu
4. Y. Zhang
5. Mike W. Peng
6. Roy Thurik
7. J. Lu
8. Haiyang Li

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Roy Thurik
2. Martin A. Carree
3. Dirk De Clercq
4. H. P. Bowen
5. Dean Xu
6. J. Lu
7. Qian Gu
8. Haiyang Li

Citations in the corpus

• Linkages and spillovers in global production networks: firm-level analysis of the Czech automotive industry (2016, background): “This may result in negative consequences for domestic firms caused by FDI, such as crowding out effects, leading to the loss of competitiveness, downgrading and closure (Blomstro¨m and Kokko, 1998; De Backer and Sleuwaegen, 2003; Go¨rg and Greenaway, 2004; Oetzel and Doh, 2009).”
• The Lag Structure of the Impact of Business Ownership on Economic Performance in OECD Countries (2006, background): “This is a result of the relatively high hazard rates of young firms (e.g. Evans, 1987; Storey and Wynarczyk, 1996) and of displacement effects (e.g. de Backer and Sleuwaegen, 2003 and Lay, 2003).”
• Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort (2008, result): “…put differently, that a high presence of foreign firms may reduce the prospects for domestic-based highgrowth entrepreneurship – a finding consistent with studies that have found that the presence of multinational firms may crowd out domestic entrepreneurship (e.g., De Backer & Sleuwaegen, 2003).”
• Effects of inward investment on outward investment: The venture capital industry worldwide 1985–2007 (2011, background): “In contrast to the spillover effects, the competition effects of inward investment entail economic stagnation, lower industry productivity and a higher exit rate for domestic firms (De Backer & Sleuwaegen, 2003; Konings, 2001).”
• The Impact of Multinational Enterprise Strategy on Indigenous Enterprises: Horizontal Spillovers and Crowding Out in Developing Countries (2008, background): “De Backer and Sleuwaegen (2003) found that FDI can crowd domestic entrepre neurs out of both product and labor markets by decreasing local firms' entry rates and increas ing local firms' exit rates.”
• FDI spillovers over time in an emerging market: : The roles of entry tenure and barriers to imitation (2014, background): “00 1 relevant dimension in assessing FDI spillovers (e.g., De Backer & Sleuwaegen, 2003; Spencer, 2008), ours is the first one that directly examined the role of time in FDI spillovers.”
• Does FDI Facilitate Domestic Entry? Evidence from the Czech Republic (2010, neutral): “Using data for Belgium, De Backer and Sleuwaegen (2003) find that import competition and FDI discourage domestic entry.”
• When does FDI matter? The roles of local institutions and ethnic origins of FDI (2013, background): “By competing in the local resource market which includes land, capital and the labor force, multinational corporations (MNCs) may displace local firms, inhibiting their growth and value creation (De Backer & Sleuwagen, 2003).”
• Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China (2008, background): “De Backer and Sleuwaegen (2003), for example, found new foreign entrants and the total number of foreign firms in the Belgian manufacturing sectors decreased the founding rate and increased the exit rate of domestic firms.”