Number from a syntactic perspective: Why plural marking looks 'truer' in French than in Korean *

By Song-Nim Kwon, Anne Zribi-Hertz. 2004

58 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e6aa9bceffdcc064141902df167f9fcff10db5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. S. Hwang
2. Ruth Kramer
3. Donna Lardiere

Citations in the corpus

• A Split Analysis of Plurality: Number in Amharic (2016, background): “This type of plural is almost always analyzed as involving some kind of head that is closer to the root than Num (n: Lecarme 2002, Acquaviva 2008; a compound noun: Kwon and Zribi-Hertz 2004; a root modifier: Wiltschko 2008).”
• Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach (2013, methodology): “In (20a), the sentence without intrinsic plural marking on ‘child’ does not follow felicitously from the context, because the use of -tul is not optional if a noun has been established in a previous context as plural (Kwon and Zribi-Hertz, 2004).”