Risk of capture-related mortality in large free-ranging mammals: experiences from Scandinavia
By J. Arnemo, Per Ahlqvist, R. Andersen, F. Berntsen, G. Ericsson, J. Odden, S. Brunberg, Peter Segerström, Jon E. Swenson. 2006
205 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Equine, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e62f5bcb131ff423a6211be5a420c473fd388f0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Small Animals
Citations in the corpus
- Diet of Eurasian lynx, Lynx lynx, in the boreal forest of southeastern Norway: the relative importance of livestock and hares at low roe deer density (2006, background): “Most animals were equipped with radio-collars, apart from neonatal kittens and some few 6-month-old kittens that received freefloating intraperitoneal implant transmitters (Arnemo et al. 1999, 2006).”
- Should I stay or should I go? Natal dispersal in the brown bear (2007, methodology): “An overall mortality rate of 0.3% was found for 892 captures during 1992e2004 (Arnemo et al. 2006).”
- Do bears know they are being hunted (2012, background): “to the collar (Arnemo et al., 2006).”
- Temperature-mediated habitat use and selection by a heat-sensitive northern ungulate (2012, background): “…capture-related mortalities (one was euthanized F. M. van Beest et al. / Animal Behaviour 84 (2012) 723e735 725 because of a broken leg and one was asphyxiated by vomit), a mortality rate of 0.8%, which falls within the 2% mortality limit considered acceptable in Scandinavia (Arnemo et al. 2006).”
- Coping with human disturbance: spatial and temporal tactics of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) (2010, background): “For more details on drug protocols, see Arnemo (2005) and Arnemo et al. (2006).”
- Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology (2010, background): “In addition to the impact on sample sizes, failures often result in the need to capture and handle additional individuals that precipitates costly and risky re capture (Arnemo et al. 2006).”