MACROALGAL SPORE DISPERSAL IN COASTAL ENVIRONMENTS: MECHANISTIC INSIGHTS REVEALED BY THEORY AND EXPERIMENT
By B. Gaylord, D. Reed, P. Raimondi, L. Washburn. 2006
129 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2e5dad37e129ad8c72ada237926a71e12446f200
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- H. Christie
- K. Norderhaug
- S. Fredriksen
- M. Pedersen
- Lars Brammer Nejrup
- F. Moy
- Dan A. Smale
- Pippa J. Moore
In Oceanography
- H. Christie
- K. Norderhaug
- S. Fredriksen
- K. Sutherland
- M. Pedersen
- J. Prairie
- A. Kaltenberg
- K. Nickols
Citations in the corpus
- Variation in the strength of continental boundary currents determines continent‐wide connectivity in kelp (2011, unknown): “In contrast, zoospores may disperse kilometres from their point of origin (Gaylord et al. 2002, 2006; Reed, Schroeter &Raimondi 2004) and fertile drift material even further (Hernández-Carmona, Hughes & Graham 2006).”
- Sea urchin barrens as alternative stable states of collapsed kelp ecosystems (2014, unknown): “Kelp spores are short-lived and typically settle within 5 to 10 m of the parent plant (Norton 1992, Gaylord et al. 2012), although maximum dispersal distances of up to 5 km have been measured for some species (e.g. Laminaria hyperborea, Norton 1992; Macrocystis pyrifera, Gaylord et al. 2006).”
- Effects of wave exposure on population structure, demography, biomass and productivity of the kelp Laminaria hyperborea (2012, background): “…spores can potentially disperse at the scale of several hundred meters to kilometers, depending on water motion (Fredriksen et al. 1995, Gaylord et al. 2002, Reed et al. 2004), but the majority of these spores may still settle relatively close to the spore-producing plants (Gaylord et al. 2006).”
- Biophysical interactions in the plankton: A cross‐scale review (2012, background): “[22] Larger-scale processes, such as waves, mediate background flow conditions and influence planktonic distributions in and near BBLs. Wave-current interactions increase shear stress and the apparent roughness of the bottom (Grant and Madsen 1986; Nittrouer and Wright 1994; Gaylord et al. 2006).”