Behavioral responses of brown bears mediate nutritional effects of experimentally introduced tourism

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism : A review (2017, background): “In this way bears may 212 maximize foraging efficiency in order to compensate for reduced total time spent 213 foraging (Rode et al., 2006a).”
Coping with human disturbance: spatial and temporal tactics of the brown bear (Ursus arctos) (2010, background): “Bears can avoid human presence by staying far from human infrastructures during times of high human activity (Rode et al. 2006) and approach these areas during the night.”
Hematological differences between stingrays at tourist and non-visited sites suggest physiological costs of wildlife tourism. (2009, background): “…the range of the animal’s normal behavioural and physiological repertoire may pose minimal costs (e.g., brown bear, Ursus arctos, wildlife viewing; Rode et al., 2006), and in some cases animals can alter their lifehistory traits to take advantage of the novel conditions created ll rights…”
Food availability and foraging near human developments by black bears (2013, background): “Furthermore, the presence of humans has been shown to affect foraging behavior in grizzly bears, where intake rate of food decreases (Rode et al. 2006).”