Attention, Researchers! It Is Time to Take a Look at the Real World

By Alan Kingstone, Daniel Smilek, Jelena Ristic, Chris Kelland Friesen, J. Eastwood. 2003

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2df0df73b0ca7fa84e90c94447ae569fb257af90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Citations in the corpus

Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: a systematic review. (2009, unknown): “…research has emphasised the clinical significance of intra-individual variability in (flanker) task performance (e.g. Castellanos et al., 2005; Klein et al., 2006), provides impetus for future research investigating the temporal and oscillatory anti-correlations between the DMN and…”
The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology (2006, background): “Interestingly, Kingstone and colleagues, investigating attention in healthy people, have reached a similar position (e.g., Kingstone et al., 2003, 2005).”
A new form of human spatial attention: Automated symbolic orienting (2012, background): “…elicited by different types of nonsocial behaviourally relevant (e.g., arrows, digits; Dodd, van der Stigchel, Leghari, Fung, & Kingstone, 2008; Kingstone, Smilek, Ristic, Friesen, & Eastwood, 2003) and social biologically relevant cues (e.g., eye gaze, finger point, head direction; Friesen et…”
Gaze selection in complex social scenes (2008, result): “This outcome would dovetail with recent studies suggesting that many of the lab-based studies of social orienting to gaze direction have overestimated the impact of gaze direction on the orienting of spatial attention (see Kingstone, Smilek, Ristic, Friesen, & Eastwood, 2003 ).”
Spontaneous attentional fluctuations in impaired states and pathological conditions: a neurobiological hypothesis. (2007, background): “Historically the focus has been almost exclusively on attention as a platform for active, goal-directed, and focused processing of information (Kingstone et al., 2003).”
Get real! Resolving the debate about equivalent social stimuli (2009, background): “Given that arrows have been thought of as socially relevant objects (Kingstone et al., 2003; Tipples, 2002), would they receive preferential attention when placed among other objects when there are no people present?”
Goal Control of Attention to Advertising: The Yarbus Implication (2007, background): “Moreover, the current embryonic stage of knowledge about goal control of attention to advertising and other complex scenes (Kingstone et al. 2003; Pashler et al. 2001) permits a number of broad predictions only, which we present here.”
Reorienting Spatial Attention within Visual Working Memory (2019, background): “Previous studies suggested that in the perceptual domain exogenous cues always attracted attention in the condition with 50% validity while endogenous cues did not (Briand, 1998; Kingstone et al., 2003; Posner, 1978).”