Recent perspectives on trade and inequality
By Ann E. Harrison, J. McLaren, Margaret S. McMillan. 2011
267 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The 1990's dealt a blow to traditional Heckscher-Ohlin analysis of the relationship between trade and income inequality, as it became clear that rising inequality in low-income countries and other features of the data were inconsistent with that model. As a result, economists moved away from trade as a plausible explanation for rising income inequality. In recent years, however, a number of new mechanisms have been explored through which trade can affect(and usually increase) income inequality. These include within-industry effects due to heterogeneous?firms; effects of offshoring of tasks; effects on incomplete contracting; and effects of labor-market frictions. A number these mechanisms have received substantial empirical support.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2da8d0df6112dec96c57fe0d057f6e6ea5a52941
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Chong Xiang
- J. Munch
- Leonardo Gasparini
- C. Malgouyres
- Philipp Heimberger
- David L. Hummels
- Jonas Hjort
- James Fenske
Citations in the corpus
- The Arrival of Fast Internet and Employment in Africa (2019, background): “The slow economic progress of poor workers in many parts of Africa, Asia, and Latin America during the last few decades therefore surprised economists.”
- The Impact of Chinese Import Competition on the Local Structure of Employment and Wages: Evidence from France (2017, methodology): “For instance Harrison et al. (2011), in their review of recent theoretical and empirical works on trade and within-country inequality, do not cite any papers looking at the impact of globalization on the distribution of wages using the empirical approach used here.”
- Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta‐analysis (2020, background): “Several qualitative reviews show that academic scholars have contributed to a rapidly growing literature (e.g. Burtless 1995; Ravallion 2003; Winters et al. 2004; Anderson 2005; Demirguc-Kunt and Levine 2009; Mills 2009; Nissanke and Thorbecke 2010; Harrison et al. 2011; de Haan and Sturm 2017).”
- Recent trends in inequality and poverty in developing countries (2013, background): “The theoretical channels linking these changes to inequality are multiple and complex, which accounts for the lack of conclusive empirical results (Wood, 1997; Rama, 2003; Winters et al., 2004; Anderson, 2005; Goldberg and Pavcnik, 2007; Harrison et al., 2011).”
- Offshoring and Labor Markets (2018, background): “For more discussions, see the surveys by Harrison, McLaren, and McMillan (2011) and Antras and Yeaple (2014).”
- Ecology, trade and states in pre-colonial Africa (2014, background): “Though recent trade models argue that trade increases inequality by raising incomes of abundant factors, increasing skill premia, and through search frictions in import-competing sectors (Harrison et al., 2011), these are of limited relevance to pre-industrial societies.”
- The China Shock: Learning from Labor Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade (2016, unknown): “…to the predictions of textbook trade models, manufacturing industries in developed countries appeared to be substituting toward high-skill workers despite rising skill prices, 1 For formal surveys of the literature on trade and wages, see Feenstra & Hanson (2003) and Harrison et al. (2011).”