Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Dialogical Models of Explanation (2007, methodology): “The old version of the dialectical model of explanation given in (Walton, 2004, Walton, 2004a and Walton, 2005) had three sets of conditions defining what should be taken to constitute an explanation.”
Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts (2007, background): “Studies on legal reasoning by [2, 3, 21, 25, 26, 29] and others have built theoretical models of legal reasoning and represented argumentation structures in a logical formalism (e.”
Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion (2006, unknown): “Two millennia later, after a long time of being marginalized, argumentation has become a source of methods and tools for computing (Reed and Norman, 2004), especially in artiﬁcial intelligence and law (Bench-Capon, 1997; Walton, 2005).”