Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion

By Douglas Walton. 2006

76 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Tim Miller
2. Paul E. S. Dunne
3. Douglas Walton
4. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
5. Timothy J. Ellis
6. Yair Levy
7. Sanjay Modgil
8. Henry Prakken

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Tim Miller
2. Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
3. Paul E. S. Dunne
4. Timothy J. Ellis
5. Yair Levy

Citations in the corpus

• Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences (2017, methodology): “To overcome this, Walton proposes the use of examination dialogues [180] as a method for the explainer to determine whether the explainee has correctly understood the explanation — that is, the explainer has a real understanding, not merely a perceived (or claimed) understanding.”
• Argumentation in artificial intelligence (2007, background): “8 Indeed, independently Dunne, Doutre, and Bench-Capon [85] and Walton, himself, in [187] have analysed one dialogue form not presented in [189].”
• A dialogue system specification for explanation (2011, methodology): “An analysis of the structure of examination dialogue was presented in Walton (2006) .”
• A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research (2006, background): “Toulmin (1958) proposed a model for argumentation that is being used in the legal environment for the development of arguments toward case presentations in courts (Walton, 2006).”