An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction.

By O. Simonetti, R. Kim, David S. Fieno, H. Hillenbrand, E. Wu, J. Bundy, J. Finn, R. Judd. Radiology, 2001

1,427 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessment of Myocardial Fibrosis with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (2011, background): “time [85], slice thickness, and so on), but also according”
Phase‐sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium‐delayed hyperenhancement † (2002, methodology): “is common practice with IR using magnitude detection (5).”
Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance. (2011, background): “Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio are reported as assessments of image quality (8).”
Impact of Unrecognized Myocardial Scar Detected by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Event-Free Survival in Patients Presenting With Signs or Symptoms of Coronary Artery Disease (2006, neutral): “Calcium channel blocker, n (%) 30 (15) 7 (16) 23 (15) 0.”
Myocardial scarring in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. (2002, methodology): “Contrast-enhanced images were acquired using a segmented inversion-recovery sequence, which has been described previously (21).”
Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heart (2004, background): “After the contrast medium was applied, the infarcted region presented as a region with markedly lower T1 times compared to the remote myocardium, corresponding to the “delayed enhancement” phenomenon commonly utilized for viability imaging (22,23).”