Evaluation of ontologies

By Asunción Gómez-Pérez. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2001

372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: Where is their meeting point? (2003, methodology): “However, many other methods and methodologies have been proposed for other tasks, such as ontology reengineering [29], ontology learning [2] [45], ontology evaluation [25] [27] [35] [36] [41] [42], ontology evolution [47] [48] [58] [63], ontology merging [59], etc.”
Ontologies: How can They be Built? (2004, background): “Two important proposals for ontology evaluation are (Gómez-Pérez 2001; GómezPérez et al. 1995) and ONTOCLEAN (Guarino and Welty 2002; Welty and Guarino 2001).”
Croissant: A Metadata Format for ML-Ready Datasets (2024, neutral): “"extract": {"fileProperty": "content"} "@id": "images/hash", 17 "@type": "cr:Field",”