The Internet in everyday life

By P. Nayar. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2004

506 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d65816631c1b8430eabb049c08ce49318fde1f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

Citations in the corpus

Social media and migration: Virtual community 2.0 (2011, background): “These individuals participate in a number of different networks but the members of networks may not know each other, leading to the phrase ‘networking individualism’ (Castells, 2001; Castells, Fernandez-Ardevol, Qiu, & Sey, 2006; Wellman & Haythornthwaite, 2002; Wellman et al., 2003).”
Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media (2002, background): “We see such effects in use of the Internet , as friends and family use e-mail to strengthen their ties, and as strangers use chat rooms to contact new others (see the collected papers in Haythornthwaite & Wellman, 2001; Wellman & Haythornthwaite, forthcoming).”
The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld (2009, background): “…of exchanges, frequency of contact, strength of ties, intimacy, qualitative elements of relations, size of networks, global or local span of networks and numerous other variables (Haythornthwaite, 2000, 2001, 2002a, 2002b, 2005; Haythornthwaite and Wellman, 1998; Haythornthwaite et al., 1995).”
Who plays, how much, and why? Debunking the stereotypical gamer profile (2008, background): “Likewise, they could lead to different levels of cognitive processing that lead to different patterns of schema formation, use and recall ( Eagley & Chaiken, 1993; Petty & Cacioppo, 1996).”
Multiple determinants of life quality: the roles of Internet activities, use of new media, social support, and leisure activities (2005, background): “Wellman and Haythornthwaite (2002) also found that those who have more ‘‘real’’ support receive more Internet support.”
The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism (2006, background): “Yet, the Internet has become embedded in the daily lives of much of the developed world (DiMaggio et al., 2001; Howard, Rainie & Jones, 2002; Wellman & Haythornthwaite, 2002).”
PREDICTORS AND CONSEQUENCES OF DIFFERENTIATED PRACTICES ON SOCIAL NETWORK SITES (2010, background): “Wellman & Haythornthwaite 2002 ; Fallows 2004 ; Howard & Jones 2004 ), it seems problematic to collapse all SNS users into one group.”
Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet (2006, background): “Length of access to the Internet proved to be related to more confidence in conducting online activities such as searching for information, conducting banking operations and using the Internet to enhance social relationships (Haythornthwaite & Kazmer 2002; Wellman & Haythornthwaite 2002).”
Trust Online: Young Adults' Evaluation of Web Content (2010, background): “This underscores the importance of seeing information technology uses in the larger context of people’s everyday lives where online and offline activities are constantly intertwined (Wellman & Haythornthwaite, 2002).”
Structure and time evolution of an Internet dating community (2002, background): “same needs as face-to-face interaction, and should not be regarded as a separate arena but as an integrated part of modern social life (Wellman and Haythornthwaite 2002).”
Family Relations and the Internet: Exploring a Family Boundaries Approach (2006, background): “The potential risk may contribute to family conflicts as parents attempt to protect their children through rules that regulate type of use ( Mesch, in press ).”
Patterns and dynamics of users' behavior and interaction: Network analysis of an online community (2009, background): “…extend current research on system use (Burton-Jones & Gallivan, 2007; Lee, Kozar, & Larsen, 2003; Szajina, 1993; Tyre & Orlikowski, 1994; Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis, 2003) and online social interactions (Boase et al., 2006; Boase, 2008; Wellman et al., 1996; Wellman & Haythornthwaite, 2002).”
The New Generation of Public Participation: Internet-based Participation Tools (2010, background): “Email: cowley.11@osu.edu Planning Practice & Research, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 397–408, June 2010 transcend spatial boundaries of the past, creating increased contact and accessibility in every certain domains (Wellman & Haythornthwaite, 2002; Boase et al ., 2006).”