Corporate Socially Responsible Investments: CEO Altruism, Reputation, and Shareholder Interests

By R. Borghesi, Joel F. Houston, A. Naranjo. 2014

811 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d213e8fc12088b44f2194cc3fead1f6ab4f45d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Married CEOs and corporate social responsibility (2019, neutral): “, 2016), and invest in CSR, particularly in diversity and humanitarian CSR categories (Borghesi et al., 2014).”
Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation for Corporate Social Responsibility (2015, neutral): “…finding that CSR may be used to advance personal interests over the interests of shareholders (Brown et al., 2006; Jiraporn and Chintrakarn, 2013; Borghesi et al., 2014; Cheng et al., 2014; Kruger, 2014; Masulis and Reza, 2014), provide added job security to inefficient managers by pleasing…”
Corporate Sustainability and Stock Returns: Evidence from Employee Satisfaction (2020, neutral): “However, papers such as Borghesi, Houston, and Naranjo (2014) find that if certain ESG activities come too close to represent personal political causes of executives it may have a negative effect, discouraging certain employees.”
CEO Materialism and Corporate Social Responsibility (2016, result): “Consistent with these arguments several studies document interesting correlations between a firm’s CSR characteristics and various demographic and other traits of the CEO, such as age, gender, education, tenure, political contributions, and compensation (Manner 2010; Huang et al. 2013; Borghesi et a”
Economic policy uncertainty, stakeholder engagement, and environmental, social, and governance practices: The moderating effect of competition (2020, background): “In fact, Borghesi et al. (2014)'s findings demonstrate that the higher level of CSR is associated with firms that are more likely to have agency problems (large firms with a high level of free-cash flow).”
Can board gender diversity promote corporate social performance (2017, methodology): “Previous CSR research has consistently shown that CSP is influenced by firm size (Dhaliwal et al ., 2011; Borghesi et al ., 2014).”
Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review (2019, background): “Thus, we do not consider issues such as why firms engage in CSR activities in the first place (Ramirez 2013; Borghesi et al. 2014; Windolph et al. 2014), whether CSR activities are positive net present value (NPV) projects (e.g., Flammer 2015; Khan et al. 2016; Manchiraju and Rajgopal 2017) or…”
Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption? (2020, neutral): “, the firm’s main governance body (Hill and Jones, 1992; Prado-Lorenzo and Garcia-Sanchez, 2010; Borghesi et al., 2014).”