Comparative ecophysiology of active zoobenthic filter feeding, essence of current knowledge

By H. U. Riisgård, P. S. Larsen. 2000

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d20209e36833dd8c3f8c238782106c2a1c4d4e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Separating the grain from the chaff: particle selection in suspension- and deposit-feeding bivalves (2004, background): “Although the exact mechanisms of particle capture are still controversial (Ward et al., 1998b, 2000; Riisgård and Larsen, 2000b), capture occurs as particles encounter and are retained by the frontal surfaces of the ctenidial filaments.”
InEx—a direct in situ method to measure filtration rates, nutrition, and metabolism of active suspension feeders (2005, background): “…of studies concerning their diet composition, food acquisition mechanisms, feeding rates, and water transport (reviewed by Jørgensen 1966; Bayne et al. 1976; Bayne and Newell 1983; Levinton et al. 1996; Bayne 1998; Gili and Coma 1998; Iglesias et al. 1998; Riisgård and Larsen 2000; Riisgård 2001a).”
On measurement of filtration rates in bivalves — the stony road to reliable data: review and interpretation (2001, background): “…nature lie between these extremes and it seems reasonable to suggest 286 Riisgård: On measurement of filtration rates in bivalves that the maximum filtration rates shown in Table 1 may often — or usually — be exploited in nature (for further discussion, see Riisgård 2001, Riisgård & Larsen 2001).”
Selective Capture and Ingestion of Particles by Suspension-Feeding Bivalve Molluscs: A Review (2018, unknown): “In fact, such results run counter to the current knowledge of the hydrosol ﬁltration mechanism used by suspension-feeding bivalves (e.g., Riisg (cid:2) ard et al. 1996, Ward et al. 1998, Riisg (cid:2) ard & Larsen 2000, Riisg (cid:2) ard et al. 2015).”
Small-scale spatial variability of food partitioning between cultivated oysters and associated suspension-feeding species, as revealed by stable isotopes (2007, background): “A good example of trophic plasticity is given through comparison of oysters with mussels: both species have very closed feeding processes and a capacity for particle selection (Riisgård & Larsen 2000).”
The ultimate opportunists: consumers of seston (2001, background): “…animals: collar sieving in sponges, cirri trapping in bivalves, ciliary sieving in bryozoans, ciliary downstream collecting in different taxonomic groups, mucus-net filter feeding, e.g. in ascidians and ciliary upstream collection, e.g. in phoronids (see Riisgård & Larsen 2001 for a review).”