The ultimate opportunists: consumers of seston

By R. Coma, M. Ribes, J. Gili, R. Hughes. 2001

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a557c9db12a1b67d8e1048b73053398dfc80a9d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. C. Orejas
2. J. Gili
3. W. Arntz
4. M. Harmelin-Vivien
5. P. Cresson
6. G. Lambert
7. S. Ruitton
8. S. Leys

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. Gili
2. M. Harmelin-Vivien
3. G. Lambert
4. S. Ruitton
5. C. Orejas
6. S. Leys
7. V. Wareham
8. W. Arntz

Citations in the corpus

• Role of small-plankton communities in the diet of two Antarctic octocorals (Primnoisis antarctica and Primnoella sp.) (2003, background): “Although in some species from other groups, a single prey type can provide most of the energy requirements (Asmus & Asmus 1991), it appears that a wide and heterogeneous diet is a common feeding strategy in littoral benthic suspension feeders (e.g. Stuart & Klumpp 1984, Coma et al. 2001).”
• Stable C and N isotopic composition of cold-water corals from the Newfoundland and Labrador continental slope: Examination of trophic, depth and spatial effects (2008, background): “Substrate control over feeding habits, at least for the octocorals, is consistent with the O.A. Sherwood et al. / Deep-Sea Research I 55 (2008) 1392–14021398 idea that diets vary in proportion to food availability (Ribes et al., 1999; Coma et al., 2001).”
• In situ feeding and metabolism of glass sponges (Hexactinellida, Porifera) studied in a deep temperate fjord with a remotely operated submersible (2007, result): “This pattern is similar to that seen in shallow demosponges (Ribes et al. 1999; Yahel et al. 2003) and indicates that the sponges are well adapted to utilize this food source (Coma et al. 2001).”
• Ecology and natural history of the protochordates (2005, background): “5–2 μm range (Flood and Fiala-Medioni 1981; Coma et al. 2001; Tatián et al. 2002; Bone et al. 2003), although they do take larger particles including their own gametes (Young 1988; G.”
• Artificial reefs do increase secondary biomass production: mechanisms evidenced by stable isotopes (2014, methodology): “Terrestrial inputs were taken into account by sampling POM brought to the sea by the Huveaune River.”