Tax competition and tax co-ordination under destination and origin principles: a synthesis
By Ben Lockwood. 2001
126 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d0a19c0bf0380428c610f11a2aa862ab30e257a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- John D. Wilson
- David E. Wildasin
- Masayoshi Hayashi
- Robin Boadway
- Thiess Buettner
- Marko Koethenbuerger
- F. Revelli
- Michael P. Devereux
In Economics and Econometrics
- John D. Wilson
- David E. Wildasin
- Masayoshi Hayashi
- Robin Boadway
- Thiess Buettner
- Marko Koethenbuerger
- F. Revelli
- Michael P. Devereux
In Political Science and International Relations
- John D. Wilson
- David E. Wildasin
- Masayoshi Hayashi
- Robin Boadway
- Thiess Buettner
- Marko Koethenbuerger
- F. Revelli
- Michael P. Devereux
Citations in the corpus
- An empirical analysis of intergovernmental tax interaction: the case of business income taxes in Canada (2001, methodology): “Lovell (1978) employs the percentage shortfall between actual and potential outputs estimated in Economic Report of the President, while Feldstein et al.”
- Capital tax competition: bane or boon (2004, background): “See Lockwood (1998) and Wilson (1999). J.D. Wilson, D.E.”