Political institutions, connectedness, and corporate risk-taking

By Narjess Boubakri, Sattar A. Mansi, Walid Saffar. Journal of International Business Studies, 2013

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cf8d121bad794cbc93b1248b2c835e542342ae7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Walid Saffar
2. Jeffrey A. Pittman
3. Woo‐Jong Lee
4. Omrane Guedhami
5. Xing-qiang Du
6. Clive Lennox
7. Jeong‐Bon Kim
8. Narjess Boubakri

In Strategy and Management

1. Walid Saffar
2. Jeffrey A. Pittman
3. Woo‐Jong Lee

Citations in the corpus

• Political Uncertainty and Cost Stickiness: Evidence from National Elections around the World (2020, background): “Our analysis lends empirical support to the narrative that political institutions play a major role in several firm decisions and outcomes (e.g., Rajan and Zingales, 2003; Roe, 2006; Qi et al., 2010; Boubakri et al., 2013; 2014).”
• Corporate Political Connections and Tax Aggressiveness (2013, neutral): “Although not focusing on tax risk, Boubakri et al. (2013) find that political connections are positively associated with corporate risk taking.”
• Political Institutions and Bank Risk-Taking Behavior (2015, neutral): “For example, recent studies find that firms take higher investment risks (Boubakri et al. 2013) and borrow more bank loans (Chen et al. 2014) when operating in regions with better political institutions.”