Two views on institutions and development: The grand transition vs. the primacy of institutions

By M. Paldam, E. Gundlach. 2008

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cda892fce04b7578b989e89331396cd6b1a25af

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Pettersson
2. A. Boschini
3. Jesper Roine
4. M. Paldam
5. E. Gundlach
6. F. van der ploeg
7. Donghyeon Kim
8. S. Lin

In Information Systems

1. J. Pettersson
2. Jesper Roine
3. A. Boschini
4. E. Gundlach
5. M. Paldam

In Sociology and Political Science

1. E. Gundlach
2. Jesper Roine
3. J. Pettersson
4. A. Boschini
5. M. Paldam
6. Toke S. Aidt
7. Christian Bjørnskov
8. J. Lambsdorff

Citations in the corpus

• Is trust the missing root of institutions, education, and development? (2013, unknown): “A complement is provided by the “grand transition” view, which holds that income also causally affects institutional development in the very long run, as Paldam (2002) and Paldam and Gundlach (2008) argue.”
• A Farewell to Critical Junctures: Sorting Out Long-Run Causality of Income and Democracy (2009, background): “For an overview, see Paldam and Gundlach (2008).”
• CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION: WHAT HAS PAST DECADE'S EMPIRICAL RESEARCH TAUGHT US? A SURVEY (2018, unknown): “A 2008 study instrumented the measure of income and corruption with biogeographical considerations to assert that while decreased corruption generally leads to higher levels of income in the short term, a long-term analysis shows that increased income is the driving cause of lower levels of corrupti”
• The Resource Curse and its Potential Reversal (2013, methodology): “Using measures of democracy as well as corruption Paldam and Gundlach (2008) find support for the ’Grand Transition’-view (income positively effecting institutions) over the ’Primacy of institutions’-view (institutions positively affecting growth in income).”