A data-driven software tool for enabling cooperative information sharing among police departments
By M. Redmond, Alok Baveja. 2002
193 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Software Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Aaron Roth
- Zhiwei Steven Wu
- Michael Kearns
- Eric P. Xing
- Seth Neel
- Percy Liang
- Dana Pessach
- Erez Shmueli
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Sameer Singh
- Eric P. Xing
- Le Song
- Chong You
- Miroslav Dud'ik
- Ankur P. Parikh
- Jamie H. Morgenstern
- Dana Pessach
In Information Systems
- Phebe Vayanos
- Javad Azizi
- Sina Aghaei
- Chong You
- Eric P. Xing
- Matthew Joseph
- Miroslav Dud'ik
- Ankur P. Parikh
In Software Engineering
- Chong You
- Eric P. Xing
- Ankur P. Parikh
- Dana Pessach
- Sina Aghaei
- Phebe Vayanos
- Le Song
- John Thomas Ormerod
Citations in the corpus
- Privacy-Preserving Distributed Linear Regression on High-Dimensional Data (2017, neutral): “0 · 101 28 61 3 Communities and Crime [63, 64] 122 1994 2.”
- Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithms (2019, background): “Communities & crime : The dataset contains socio-economic, law enforcement, and crime data about communities in the US (Redmond & Baveja, 2002) with 1,994 examples.”
- Learning Optimal and Fair Decision Trees for Non-Discriminative Decision-Making (2019, methodology): “We evaluate our approach on the Crime dataset (Dheeru and Karra Taniskidou 2017; Redmond and Baveja 2002) with |N| = 1993 and d = 128 .”
- A Convex Framework for Fair Regression (2017, background): “The Communities and Crime dataset The Communities and Crime Dataset [24, 28], from the UCI repository is a dataset which includes many features deemed relevant to violent crime rates (such as the percentage of the community’s population in an urban area, the community’s racial makeup, law…”
- Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods (2019, background): “Our second dataset is Communities and Crime (CC) that captures various socio-economic and law enforcement aspects, as well as crime across various communities in the US [18].”
- Algorithmic Fairness (2020, background): “It is publicly available in the UCI repository [43, 115].”
- Conformal prediction with conditional guarantees (2023, unknown): “Our next experiment examines the RxRx1 dataset (Taylor et al. (2019)) from the WILDS repository (Koh et al. (2021)).”
- Kernel Embeddings of Latent Tree Graphical Models (2011, methodology): “Finally, we explore the performance of our method on a communities and crime dataset from the UCI repository [1, 18].”
- How can we fool LIME and SHAP? Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods (2019, background): “Our second dataset is Communities and Crime (CC) that captures various socio-economic and law enforcement aspects, as well as crime across various communities in the US (Redmond and Baveja 2002).”
- A Review on Fairness in Machine Learning (2022, background): “It is publicly available in the UCI repository [49, 59, 171].”
- A variational Bayes approach to variable selection (2017, methodology): “The data collected was part of a study by Redmond and Baveja (2002) The raw data consists of 2215 samples of 147 variables the first 5 of which we regard as non-predictive, the next 124 are regarded as potential covariates while the last 18 variables are regarded as potential response variables.”