Solar Phenomena Associated with “EIT Waves”

By D. Biesecker, D. Myers, Barbara J. Thompson, D. Hammer, A. Vourlidas. 2002

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c7cb4242f515530733cfad6ec494d3740eed711

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. M. Temmer
2. Nat Gopalswamy
3. B. Vršnak
4. S. Yashiro
5. T. Howard
6. D. Webb
7. H. Hudson
8. R. Howard

In Molecular Biology

1. Nat Gopalswamy
2. M. Temmer
3. D. Webb
4. T. Howard
5. A. Zhukov
6. F. Auchère
7. B. Vršnak
8. S. Yashiro

Citations in the corpus

• THE LONGITUDINAL PROPERTIES OF A SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLE EVENT INVESTIGATED USING MODERN SOLAR IMAGING (2011, unknown): “…studies using low-cadence ultraviolet images (>12 minutes) showed that EUV waves are correlated with CMEs rather than flares (Plunkett et al. 1998; Cliver et al. 1999; Biesecker et al. 2002) and they tend to have average speeds less than 400 km s−1 (Warmuth et al. 2004; WillsDavey & Attrill 2009).”
• On the nature of EIT waves, EUV dimmings and their link to CMEs (2004, background): “After the discovery of the so-called “EIT wave” phenomenon (Thompson et al. 1998) it was soon suggested that these waves are strongly associated with CMEs (Plunkett et al. 1998).”
• Visibility of coronal mass ejections as a function of flare location and intensity (2005, background): “In addition, from the longitudinal variation of CME association with EIT waves [ Biesecker et al., 2002 ], Cliver et al. [2005] estimated 40% of the CMEs from source longitudes <60� are invisible to LASCO.”
• A multiwavelength study of solar flare waves. I. Observations and basic properties (2004, methodology): “In two of the eight events that had EIT coverage – E1 and E5 – such S-waves were found, and in both events the following EIT images showed the more usual diffuse fronts.”
• Advances in Observing Various Coronal EUV Waves in the SDO Era and Their Seismological Applications (Invited Review) (2014, unknown): “…the type IIs during 1997 were associated with EIT waves (Klassen et al., 2000), while only 29% of the 173 EIT waves from 1997-Mar to 1998-Jun were associated with Type IIs, with somewhat higher correlation rates at disk center and the limb than at intermediate longitudes (Biesecker et al., 2002).”
• Global Properties of Solar Flares (2011, background): “We now understand the EIT signatures to result from more than one mechanism; Biesecker et al. (2002) identify a small subset of them that one could associate with global shocks.”
• NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF AN EUV CORONAL WAVE BASED ON THE 2009 FEBRUARY 13 CME EVENT OBSERVED BY STEREO (2009, methodology): “Although the connection with CMEs factors strongly in many of these models, because the exact relationship between diffuse coronal waves (Biesecker et al. 2002; Vršnak 2005) and CMEs is not well understood, the physical nature of the bright front has remained inconclusive.”
• EUV WAVE REFLECTION FROM A CORONAL HOLE (2009, background): “At some stage of their evolution, faster EUV waves also seem to steepen into shocks known as brow waves (Gopalswamy, 2000; Gopalswamy et al., 2001) or sharp waves (Biesecker et al. 2002) and are associated with metric type II bursts.”
• An Observational Overview of Solar Flares (2011, background): “In a small subset of the EIT waves one can make an identification with the Moreton wave/type II phenomenon, but for the most part they have clearly different properties (Biesecker et al. 2002).”
• Coronal Mass Ejections: Observations (2012, methodology): “This is because the Thomson scattered light that enables us to observe CMEs has a polarization degree that is dependent on the direction of observation (Billings, 1966; Howard and Tappin, 2009). In what has become two of only a few studies making use of the SOHO/LASCO polarizing capabilities, Moran ”
• The Kinematics of a Globally Propagating Disturbance in the Solar Corona (2008, result): “This theory is consistent with statistical studies showing that “EIT waves” are more closely associated with CMEs than solar flares (Biesecker et al. 2002; Cliver et al. 2005).”
• Coronal “Wave”: Magnetic Footprint of a Coronal Mass Ejection? (2007, unknown): “More recently, however, statistical studies (Biesecker et al. 2002; Cliver et al. 2005) have shown EIT waves to be more closely associated with CMEs than with flares.”
• Magnetohydrodynamic Oscillations in the Solar Corona and Earth’s Magnetosphere: Towards Consolidated Understanding (2016, background): “Without CMEs, even a powerful flare cannot produce global waves (Biesecker et al. 2002; Chen 2006).”
• OBSERVATIONS AND INTERPRETATION OF A LOW CORONAL SHOCK WAVE OBSERVED IN THE EUV BY THE SDO/AIA (2011, background): “It is generally accepted that both Moreton waves and S-waves are shock waves.”