Induced morphological defenses in the wild: Predator effects on a mayfly, Drunella coloradensis
By J. Dahl, B. Peckarsky. 2002
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c386720fcb30f06aeec3a65f265f10b9095608a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- K. M. Warkentin
- M. Power
- Justin C. Touchon
- J. Holomuzki
- Andrew M. Turner
- John Feminella
- R. Stubbington
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- K. M. Warkentin
- M. Power
- Justin C. Touchon
- J. Holomuzki
- Andrew M. Turner
- John Feminella
- R. Stubbington
Citations in the corpus
- Fish and dragonfly nymph predators induce opposite shifts in color and morphology of tadpoles (2008, background): “For example, aquatic invertebrates such as larval odonates (Arnqvist and Johansson 1998, Dahl and Peckarsky 2002), a snail (Trussell 1996) and a marine bryozoan (Harvell 1998) all develop morphological defenses in response to chemical cues from predators.”
- Biotic interactions in freshwater benthic habitats (2010, background): “For example, Dahl and Peckarsky (2002) showed that waterborne trout chemicals induce a thicker exoskeleton and longer caudal filaments in Drunella mayflies and suggested that graded plasticity in such traits increases survivorship by increasing handling time and escape probability during predation…”
- SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL SCALES OF PREDATOR AVOIDANCE: EXPERIMENTS WITH FISH AND SNAILS (2003, background): “Most studies of predator-induced defenses are done in a laboratory setting (but see Magurran et al. 1996, Bernot and Turner 2001, Dahl and Peckarsky 2002).”