Strategic environmental policy; eco-dumping or a green strategy?

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? An Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis (2005, background): “Greaker (2003) also show that strict ERs may improve a domestic firm’s competitiveness in international markets if it transforms some of its variable costs into sunk expenditures.”
Does Environmental Regulation Indirectly Induce Upstream Innovation? New Evidence from India (2017, unknown): “Introduction The relationship between regulation and innovation has received considerable attention over the last two decades, especially in the context of environment (Jaffe and Palmer, 1997; Berman and Bui, 2001; Greaker, 2003; Popp, 2006).”
Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance : New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis (2011, unknown): “2 See also Greaker (2006) for a combination of the two market failures, namely spillovers and market power, in the sector of pollution abatement technologies.”
The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2010, unknown): “Thus an environmental regulation that forces adoption may switch the industry from an equilibrium with low investment in R&D to a Pareto-improving equilibrium with higher investments in R&D.8 Greaker (2003) also cites technological spillovers as a market failure that provides a theoretical foundatio”