The Dutch Creative Class and How it Fosters Urban Employment Growth

By G. Marlet, Clemens van Woerkens. 2007

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c34dbaade15b221d4fad162579503befffe7028

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Emanuela Marrocu
2. Raffaele Paci
3. E. Stam
4. E. Malecki
5. Ron A. Boschma
6. Michael Fritsch
7. Stefano Raimondo Usai
8. Andrew H. Van de Ven

In Urban Studies

1. Raffaele Paci
2. Emanuela Marrocu
3. E. Stam
4. Richard Florida

Citations in the corpus

• Entrepreneurship, Evolution and Geography (2009, background): “A spatial concentration of creative class has been shown to positively affect new firm formation rates (Van Aalst et al. 2006; Lee et al. 2004; Marlet and Van Woerkens 2007).”
• Is tolerance good or bad for growth? (2010, unknown): “, Mokyr (1990), Israel (1995) and Grell and Porter (2000).”
• Education or Creativity: What Matters Most for Economic Performance? (2012, background): “McGranahan and Wojan (2007) emphasise that Florida’s creative class not only entails high education occupations but also encompasses some technician occupations that, over time, have acquired important decision-making responsibilities, but such a high level of aggregation may indeed lead to low “con”