Education or Creativity: What Matters Most for Economic Performance?

By Emanuela Marrocu, Raffaele Paci. 2012

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57992e6f6bedfc4c20d03dc0ab7da9af3d9d4697

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Roberta Rabellotti
2. R. Crescenzi
3. C. Pietrobelli
4. Richard Florida
5. Haifeng Qian
6. J. Neilson
7. S. Iammarino
8. A. Scott

In Political Science and International Relations

1. R. Crescenzi
2. Roberta Rabellotti
3. C. Pietrobelli
4. Richard Florida
5. S. Iammarino

In Urban Studies

1. R. Crescenzi
2. Richard Florida
3. C. Pietrobelli
4. Roberta Rabellotti
5. Haifeng Qian
6. A. Scott
7. C. Grodach
8. Kevin Stolarick

Citations in the corpus

• The Creative Class and Economic Development (2014, result): ““Our results,” it concluded, “indicate that highly educated people working in creative occupations are the most relevant component in explaining production efficiency” (Marrocu & Paci, 2012, p. 369).”
• Innovation drivers, value chains and the geography of multinational corporations in Europe (2014, background): “The availability of skills in the regional population is a crucial asset for regional competiveness in the EU (Crescenzi, 2005; Marrocu and Paci, 2012 and Carlino and Hunt 2009 for the US).”