Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants
By E. Spencer, P. Appleby, G. Davey, T. Key. Public Health Nutrition, 2002
1,082 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c1600be0d1f24d3235f992e4018e5c582b1fd6c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- Associations Between Women’s Body Image and Happiness: Results of the YouBeauty.com Body Image Survey (YBIS) (2015, neutral): “(Spencer et al. 2002).”
- Does Size Matter in Australia (2010, background): “5 The collection of anthropometric data by self-report has often been shown to be subject to error ( Spencer et al., 2002 ).”
- Prepregnancy BMI and the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review of the literature with meta‐analysis (2009, background): “Although self-reported weight and height data are generally considered valid even in epidemiologic studies (97), underestimation of weight is especially common among overweight women (98).”
- A comparison of direct vs. self‐report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review (2007, neutral): “1 Allison 1998 (29) 7 1 4 12 2 Alvarez-Torices 1993 (30) 8 3 4 15 3 Avila-Funes 2004 (31) 8 2 4 14 5 Bolton-Smith 2000 (32) 7 2 3 12 6 Booth 2000 (33) 5 2 4 11 7 Bostrom 1997 (34) 6 2 4 12 8 Brown 2002 (35) 7 1 4 12 9 Brunet 2003 (87) 6 1 4 11 10 Cash 1989 (36) 5 0 3 8 11 Chor 1999 (37) 6* 1 4 11 13”