Improving physical realism, stereochemistry and side-chain accuracy in homology modeling: four approaches that performed well in CASP8

By Elmar Krieger, Keehyoung Joo, Jinwoo Lee, Jooyoung Lee, Srivatsan Raman, James Thompson, Michael D. Tyka, D. Baker, Kevin J. Karplus. 2009

543 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A correct alignment is an essential requirement in homology modeling. Yet in order to bridge the structural gap between template and target, which may not only involve loop rearrangements, but also shifts of secondary structure elements and repacking of core residues, high‐resolution refinement methods with full atomic details are needed. Here, we describe four approaches that address this “last mile of the protein folding problem” and have performed well during CASP8, yielding physically realistic models: YASARA, which runs molecular dynamics simulations of models in explicit solvent, using a new partly knowledge‐based all atom force field derived from Amber, whose parameters have been optimized to minimize the damage done to protein crystal structures. The LEE‐SERVER, which makes extensive use of conformational space annealing to create alignments, to help Modeller build physically realistic models while satisfying input restraints from templates and CHARMM stereochemistry, and to remodel the side‐chains. ROSETTA, whose high resolution refinement protocol combines a physically realistic all atom force field with Monte Carlo minimization to allow the large conformational space to be sampled quickly. And finally UNDERTAKER, which creates a pool of candidate models from various templates and then optimizes them with an adaptive genetic algorithm, using a primarily empirical cost function that does not include bond angle, bond length, or other physics‐like terms. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Claudio Mirabello
  2. Pierangelo Veltri
  3. Gianluca Pollastri
  4. Jinbo Xu
  5. Pierre Baldi
  6. Jianlin Cheng

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Claudio Mirabello
  2. Ian Walsh
  3. Pierangelo Veltri
  4. Giuseppe Tradigo
  5. Gianluca Pollastri
  6. Predrag Kukic
  7. Jinbo Xu

In Molecular Biology

  1. Claudio Mirabello
  2. Ian Walsh
  3. Gianluca Pollastri
  4. Pierangelo Veltri
  5. Giuseppe Tradigo
  6. Predrag Kukic
  7. Jinbo Xu
  8. Pierre Baldi

Citations in the corpus