The value-relevance of R&D and advertising expenditures: Evidence from Korea
By Bong-ho Han, David Manry. 2004
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c0bb822e00b708258ccf05fe1227cba4d16806a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Thomas Jeanjean
- Anne Cazavan-Jeny
- P. D. Jong
- Jaeseok Jeong
- Xueming Luo
- R. Peterson
- A. Cheung
- Leif Atle Beisland
In Strategy and Management
- Thomas Jeanjean
- Anne Cazavan-Jeny
- P. D. Jong
- Jaeseok Jeong
- Xueming Luo
- R. Peterson
- A. Cheung
- Leif Atle Beisland
Citations in the corpus
- Does advertising spending really work? The intermediate role of analysts in the impact of advertising on firm value (2010, background): “Echoing this, McAlister et al. (2007) suggest that advertising spending lowers systematic risk of the firm,1 although some authors show that advertising spending may have negative effects on firm profitability (Erickson and Jacobson 1992; Han and Manry 2004).”
- The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approach (2006, background): “According to Han and Manry (2004), who study a sample of Korean firms, the association between R&D expenditures and stock prices is stronger for the portion of capitalized R&D expenditures.”
- Exploring the impact of advertising and R&D expenditures on corporate brand value and firm-level financial performance (2010, background): “Han and Manry (2004) studied the contemporaneous relationship between stock price and research and development expenditures (both capitalized and expensed) and advertising expenditures for a sample of Korean firms.”