Emerging tools for measuring and modeling the in situ activity of soil extracellular enzymes

By M. Wallenstein, M. Weintraub. 2008

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Materials Chemistry, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bfeb2657e1e7f9c629aee8cb817a7a94d2ead40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

1. J. Paz-Ferreiro
2. S. Fu
3. J. Schimel
4. Y. Kuzyakov
5. M. Spohn
6. Colin W. Bell
7. M. Wallenstein
8. A. S. Grandy

In Materials Chemistry

1. J. Paz-Ferreiro
2. S. Fu
3. J. Schimel
4. Y. Kuzyakov
5. M. Spohn
6. Colin W. Bell
7. M. Wallenstein

In Pollution

1. Y. Kuzyakov
2. M. Spohn
3. J. Paz-Ferreiro
4. S. Fu
5. B. Razavi
6. J. Schimel
7. R. Sinsabaugh
8. Colin W. Bell

Citations in the corpus

• Distribution of microbial- and root-derived phosphatase activities in the rhizosphere depending on P availability and C allocation – Coupling soil zymography with 14C imaging (2013, background): “Especially, a lack of spatially explicit methods for the determination of the distribution of enzyme activity in the rhizosphere has been emphasized several times (Wallenstein and Weintraub, 2008; Burns et al., 2012).”
• Soil aggregate size mediates the impacts of cropping regimes on soil carbon and microbial communities (2015, methodology): “, Management of Carbon Sequestration in Soil, CRC. Press, Boca Raton, FL (1997), pp. 1-10 View Record in Scopus Ling et al., 2014 N. Ling, Y. Sun, J. Ma, J. Guo, P. Zhu, C. Peng, G. Yu, W. Ran, S. Guo, Q. ShenResponse of the bacterial diversity and soil enzyme activity in particle-size fractions of ”
• Soil zymography – A novel in situ method for mapping distribution of enzyme activity in soil (2013, background): “therefore may lead to an overestimation of enzyme activity (Wallenstein and Weintraub, 2008).”
• Biological Indices for Soil Quality Evaluation: Perspectives and Limitations (2016, methodology): “Mass spectrometer-based proteomics and genomics, such as the use of PCR primers has helped to identify the biological origin of soil proteins, including many enzymes, which allows measurement and interpretation of in situ enzymatic activity (Wallenstein & Weintraub, 2008; Cañizares et al., 2011).”
• Plant nitrogen uptake drives rhizosphere bacterial community assembly during plant growth (2015, methodology): “Enzyme assays were conducted using standard fluorimetric techniques (Saiya-Cork et al., 2002; Wallenstein and Weintraub, 2008; Bell et al., 2013).”
• Extracellular enzymes in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments: perspectives on system variability and common research needs (2013, background): “…interactions are dictated by mineralogy, composition of associated organic substances, and thermodynamic properties; these interactions in turn regulate the active enzyme pool-size, access to organic substrates, and turnover rates (Allison 2006; Wallenstein and Weintraub 2008; Sinsabaugh 2010).”
• Evolutionary-Economic Principles as Regulators of Soil Enzyme Production and Ecosystem Function (2010, background): “For example, the mechanisms that determine the composition, timing, spatial location, and quantity of extracellular enzyme production in soil are still poorly known ( Wallenstein and Weintraub 2008 ).”
• The Microbial Efficiency‐Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? (2013, background): “This disconnect may be attributed to our inability to detect enzyme activity in situ (Wallenstein & Weintraub, 2008).”
• Stability and dynamics of enzyme activity patterns in the rice rhizosphere: Effects of plant growth and temperature (2017, background): “In situ visualization of the spatio-temporal distribution of enzyme activity in critical spheres, such as the rhizosphere, and how it is affected by temperature is required to reveal complex interactions between microorganisms, enzymes, and SOM decomposition (Wallenstein and Weintraub, 2008).”
• Optimization of hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme methods for ecosystem studies (2011, background): “…when running enzyme assays on environmental samples is that these assays measure “maximum potential” enzymatic activity, not the actual rates of enzymatically catalyzed reactions (“realized activity”) in soil or litter (Burns, 1978a; Tabatabai and Dick, 2002; Wallenstein and Weintraub, 2008).”