The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth
By R. Landau, Nathan Rosenberg. 2015
469 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2be5b7375796d7f777d8acaab6a53a5d81dfffb1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Markus Grillitsch
- Ben R. Martin
- Michaela Trippl
- Jerker Moodysson
- Michel Callon
- Kristin Brandl
- Juergen Janger
- Petra Andries
Citations in the corpus
- Twenty challenges to innovation studies (2015, methodology): “6 This might look rather like our model of the innovation process following Kline and Rosenberg (1986) – in other words, not a linear model but a chain-linked interactive model (Martin, 2010b).”
- Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society (2013, background): “a) R&D and non-R&D innovators: this distinction, based on the performance of inhouse (intramural) R&D 6 , arises from the recognition of the fact that R&D is not the only driver of innovation (Kline and Rosenberg, 1986; Cohen et al. 1987; Galende and Suarez, 1999; Von Tunzelmann and Acha, 2005; Jens”
- What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative? (2006, background): “The linear view of technological change has recently been superseded by a non-linear conceptual model featuring feedback loops emanating from each stage (Kline and Rosenberg 1986).”
- Combining Knowledge from Different Sources, Channels and Geographical Scales (2013, background): “Processes of innovation have undergone a significant transformation over the past years, becoming increasingly complex, interactive and open in nature (Chesbrough, 2003; Kline & Rosenberg, 1986; Lundvall, 1988).”
- Comparing knowledge bases: on the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden (2013, background): “In this stream of literature, innovation is largely understood as an outcome of interactive, non-linear processes (Kline and Rosenberg, 1986; Pavitt, 2005), emanating from interaction among various actors in industries, universities and governmental agencies (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 1997, see als”
- The EU 2020 Innovation Indicator: A Step Forward in Measuring Innovation Outputs and Outcomes? (2017, background): “9“… it is a serious mistake (increasingly common in societies that have a growing preoccupation with high technology industries) to equate economically important innovations with that subset associated with sophisticated technologies” (Kline and Rosenberg, 1986, p. 278).”
- The business model dilemma of technology shifts (2014, background): “Despite having been heavily questioned (e.g., Cantisani, 2006; Chesbrough, 2003; Kline and Rosenberg, 1986), the general notion is that new technologies are initially developed internally and then brought to a market in which demand already exists or will be created (Brem and Voigt, 2009).”
- The nature of innovation in global value chains (2021, background): “…contributions Arrow (1962), Håkanson and Nobel (1993), Howells (1990), Schumpeter (1942) Bartlett and Ghoshal (1989), ( Cantwell & Mudambi, 2005), Kline and Rosenberg (1986), Nelson and Winter (1982) Chesbrough (2003), Laursen and Salter (2006) Key IB concepts Central homebased R&D lab (R&D home…”
- Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (2013, background): “First, the point made elsewhere by Rosenberg (1982), Kline and Rosenberg (1986), Pavitt (1999), and Nelson (1981) continues to apply: scientific principles help a lot but are rarely enough.”