ISM properties in low-metallicity environments II. The dust spectral energy distribution of NGC 1569

By F. Galliano, S. Madden, A. Jones, C. Wilson, J. Bernard, F. L. Peintre. 2003

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present new 450 and 850  μ m SCUBA data of the dwarf galaxy NGC 1569. We construct the mid-infrared to millimeter SED of NGC 1569, using ISOCAM, ISOPHOT, IRAS, KAO, SCUBA and MAMBO data, and model the SED in order to explore the nature of the dust in low metallicity environments. The detailed modeling is performed in a self-consistent way, synthesizing the global ISRF of the galaxy using an evolutionary synthesis model with further constraints provided by the observed MIR ionic lines and a photoionisation model. Our results show that the dust properties are different in this low metallicity galaxy compared to other more metal rich galaxies. The results indicate a paucity of PAHs probably due to the destructive effects of the ISRF penetrating a clumpy environment and a size-segregation of grains where the emission is dominated by small grains of size ~$3\;\rm nm$, consistent with the idea of shocks having a dramatic effect on the dust properties in NGC 1569. A significant millimetre excess is present in the dust SED which can be explained by the presence of ubiquitous very cold dust ($T = 5{-}7$ K). This dust component accounts for 40 to 70% of the total dust mass in the galaxy ($1.6{-}3.4 \times 10^5$ $M_\odot$) and could be distributed in small clumps (size $\simeq$ a few pc) throughout the galaxy. We find a gas-to-dust mass ratio of 740-1600, larger than that of the Galaxy and a dust-to-metals ratio of $1/4$ to $1/7$. We generate an extinction curve for NGC 1569, consistent with the modeled dust size distribution. This extinction curve has relatively steep FUV rise and smaller 2175 A bump, resembling the observed extinction curve of some regions in the Large Magellanic Cloud.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2be232b94191afdbfd3ce5ea3ac81d68247f209a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Robert C. Kennicutt Jr.
  2. D. Dale
  3. John Moustakas
  4. F. Walter
  5. C. Conroy
  6. Lisa J. Kewley
  7. B. Groves
  8. L. Hernquist

Citations in the corpus