Glacial isostatic adjustment on 3‐D Earth models: a finite‐volume formulation

By K. Latychev, J. Mitrovica, Jeroen Tromp, M. Tamisiea, Dimitri Komatitsch, Christina C. Christara. 2005

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bb0636be3ef41a8523695ccd6d90e0a0217696c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. P. Whitehouse
2. G. Milne
3. J. Mitrovica
4. John H. Roberts
5. Kaizhong Zhang
6. F. Nimmo

In Geophysics

1. P. Whitehouse
2. G. Milne
3. John H. Roberts
4. Kaizhong Zhang
5. F. Nimmo
6. J. Mitrovica
7. Mark A. Wieczorek
8. Paul J. Tackley

Citations in the corpus

• Glacial isostatic adjustment modelling: historical perspectives, recent advances, and future directions (2018, methodology): “…including consideration of processes associated with mantle 440 convection (e.g. Mitrovica and Forte, 2004), or via the conversion of seismic velocity perturbations into mantle viscosity variations (e.g. Ivins and Sammis, 1995;Wu and van der Wal, 2003;Latychev et al., 2005b;Paulson et al., 2005).”
• Long-Term Stability of a Subsurface Ocean on Enceladus (2007, background): “Such heterogeneity can be treated numerically (Latychev et al., 2005), but is computationally expensive and beyond the scope of this paper.”
• On post-glacial sea level – II. Numerical formulation and comparative results on spherically symmetric models (2005, methodology): “D variations in visco-elastic structure (e.g. Wu & van der Wal 2003; Zhong et al. 2003; Latychev et al. 2005).”