Phytoplankton growth and stoichiometry under multiple nutrient limitation

By C. Klausmeier, Elena Litchman, Simon A. Levin. 2004

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2bae015161ae88edde1dbbe919da66da092ec6e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. C. Klausmeier
2. S. Hall
3. Elena Litchman
4. Rita Adrian
5. Dieter Gerten
6. V. Huber
7. Andreas Oschlies
8. M. Leibold

In Oceanography

1. C. Klausmeier
2. Elena Litchman
3. S. Hall
4. Andreas Oschlies
5. Rita Adrian
6. Dieter Gerten
7. V. Huber
8. M. Leibold

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Elena Litchman
2. C. Klausmeier
3. S. Hall
4. Dieter Gerten
5. Rita Adrian
6. V. Huber
7. Thomas H. Bradley
8. Andreas Oschlies

Citations in the corpus

• Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton (2004, background): “Laboratory studies show that phytoplankton are flexible in their overall stoichiometry, often matching their nutrient supply at low growth rate”
• Trait-Based Community Ecology of Phytoplankton (2008, methodology): “The mechanistic basis for such a trade-off is likely the differential investment into growth machinery (P-rich ribosomes) versus resource acquisition machinery (N-rich proteins) (Klausmeier et al. 2004a, Sterner & Elser 2002).”
• CONSTRAINTS ON PRIMARY PRODUCER N:P STOICHIOMETRY ALONG N:P SUPPLY RATIO GRADIENTS (2005, methodology): “However, nutrients sequestered in these dead producers were immediately recycled (Grover 1997), unlike in Klausmeier et al.’s model (Klausmeier et al. 2004).”
• Some thoughts on the concept of colimitation: Three definitions and the importance of bioavailability (2008, unknown): “discussing the mathematics of colimitation of phytoplankton (Legovic and Cruzado 1997; Klausmeier et al. 2004);”
• Chain model of phytoplankton P, N and light colimitation (2009, background): “Optimalitybased phytoplankton models have mostly focused on allocation (Shuter 1979, Armstrong 1999, Klausmeier et al. 2004a, Armstrong 2006), but Pahlow (2005) also considered the energetic cost of biosynthesis, and this is also done in the model presented here.”
• Ecological Networks in a Changing Climate (2010, unknown): “For instance, phytoplankton growth physiology has been extensively studied using chemostats and modelled using a range of generalizations (e.g. Klausmeier et al., 2004a,b; Litchman et al., 2004; White and Zhao, 2009) of the classic Droop model (Droop, 1983) of nutrient uptake and growth.”
• Phytoplankton response to climate warming modified by trophic state (2008, methodology): “The reason for this was that the regulation of nutrient uptake rates is poorly understood yet (Klausmeier et al. 2004), and modeling the negative feedback of internal nutrient stores on uptake rates has hardly affected the system behavior in similar models (Klausmeier et al.”
• Scalability of combining microalgae-based biofuels with wastewater facilities: A review (2015, background): “One important issue to be considered is the influence of the internal nutrient storage that contributes to the uptake rates, which can overestimate themaximum quota of the limiting nutrient if not taken into account [32].”
• Stoichiometrically Explicit Food Webs: Feedbacks between Resource Supply, Elemental Constraints, and Species Diversity (2009, background): “F or p er so na l u se o nl y. ANRV393-ES40-24 ARI 8 October 2009 9:19 (e.g., Diehl 2007; Hall et al. 2005; Klausmeier et al. 2004b, 2007).”