Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement: Analyzing and Evaluating Rater-Mediated Assessments

By T. Eckes. 2011

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The influence of training and experience on rater performance in scoring spoken language (2016, background): “Nonetheless, considerable variation in rater severity persists after training (Eckes, 2011; Lumley & McNamara, 1995) and variability in scoring criteria and decision-making processes may persist as well (Meiron, 1998; Orr, 2002; Papajohn, 2002).”
Operational Rater Types in Writing Assessment: Linking Rater Cognition to Rater Behavior (2012, methodology): “Use of an MFRM modeling approach implies the assumption that raters acted as independent experts (e.g., Eckes, 2011; Linacre, 1997).”
A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment: Recommendations and guidelines for research (2020, methodology): “This model was readily adopted in language assessment (Eckes, 2015; McNamara, 1991, 1996) and is now considered one of the most useful validation tools in studies of rater effects and bias in performance assessments (e.”