PIT Tagging: Simple Technology at Its Best
By W. Gibbons, Kimberly M. Andrews. 2004
508 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b828371310529edf2c912d111859f4f8a54cff9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Molecular Biology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- S. Cooke
- E. Thorstad
- J. Thiem
- Christa M. Woodley
- Richard S. Brown
- J. Nielsen
- M. Brad Eppard
- Krista J. Patriquin
Citations in the corpus
- Biotelemetry and biologging in endangered species research and animal conservation: relevance to regional, national, and IUCN Red List threat assessments (2008, background): “At times, the power for transmission can be derived from an external energy source (e.g. Passive Integrated Transponders, PIT tags; see Gibbons & Andrews 2004; however, this is not within the scope of this paper).”
- Do social networks of female northern long-eared bats vary with reproductive period and age? (2010, background): “…of body mass. Previous studies demonstrated that PIT tags had little impact on the morbidity, mortality, and behavior of small mammals, including bats (Gibbons and Andrews 2004), and we found no apparent difference in movement patterns between individuals with only PIT tags mean SD residency…”
- Juvenile Coho Salmon Growth and Survival across Stream Network Seasonal Habitats (2006, background): “Understanding the ecology of free-ranging fish has benefited tremendously from recent advances in fish tagging and detection technology, particularly passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags that enable refined estimates of survival, movement, and growth of large numbers of stream fishes over relat”
- Nonrandom association patterns at northern long- eared bat maternity roosts (2007, methodology): “Passively integrated transponders (PIT tags; EID-ID 100 implantable transponders, EIDAP Inc., Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada; Gibbons and Andrews 2004) were subcutaneously injected into all individuals for permanent identification.”
- Advancing the surgical implantation of electronic tags in fish: a gap analysis and research agenda based on a review of trends in intracoelomic tagging effects studies (2011, background): “Biotelemetry and biologging devices are increasingly being used to study the spatial ecology and survival of a variety of taxa in the wild (Lucas and Baras 2000; Cooke et al. 2004b; Gibbons and Andrews 2004; Block 2005; Ropert-Coudert and Wilson 2005; Nielsen et al. 2009).”
- Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future (2013, background): “A variety of electronic tagging tools have been used in freshwater for the study of vertebrates and some of the larger invertebrates (summarized in [15-18]; See Table 1).”