Pollen limitation and demographic structure in small fragmented populations of Brunsvigia radulosa (Amaryllidaceae)

By M. Ward, Steven B. Johnson. 2005

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b7a8deb5daf969c8aab2d116831df613caf8454

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. R. Winfree
2. N. Williams
3. J. Gómez
4. C. Kremen
5. S. Potts
6. L. M’Gonigle
7. R. Isaacs
8. T. Tscharntke

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. N. Williams
2. R. Winfree
3. J. Lorite
4. A. Jesús Muñoz‐Pajares
5. M. Abdelaziz
6. J. Gómez
7. F. Perfectti
8. C. Kremen

In Plant Science

1. R. Winfree
2. N. Williams
3. J. Gómez
4. C. Kremen
5. L. M’Gonigle

Citations in the corpus

• Local habitat characteristics but not landscape urbanization drive pollinator visitation and native plant pollination in forest remnants (2013, background): “…visitation patterns in response to habitat loss can decrease pollination success by reducing the quantity or quality of pollen transferred or altering plant mating patterns (Aizen and Harder, 2007; Knight et al., 2005; Ward and Johnson, 2005; Washitani et al., 1994; Cheptou and Avendano, 2006).”
• Changes in pollinator fauna cause spatial variation in pollen limitation (2010, background): “This finding is noteworthy because this effect of pollinator composition on pollen limitation, although frequently considered in theoretical approaches, has been seldom shown in the wild (Ward & Johnson 2005; McMullen 2009).”