From Empire to Nation-State: Explaining Wars in the Modern World, 1816–2001

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Introduction to Special Issue on “Disaggregating Civil War” (2009, background): “For example, nationalism and state formation are processes with a global reach that have diffused throughout the last few centuries, and their influence on political violence have recently been analyzed systematically (Wimmer and Min 2006).”
The Rise of the Nation-State across the World, 1816 to 2001 (2010, unknown): “This potential selection problem is less severe than it might first appear because we know from past research (Wimmer and Min 2006) that few secessionist states break away from nation-states and most emerge from imperial polities.”
Social network analysis: A methodological introduction (2008, methodology): “These techniques (jointly referred to as the methods of social network analysis) are applicable to a wide range of substantive domains, ranging from the analysis of concepts within mental models (Wegner, 1995; Carley, 1997) to the study of war between nations (Wimmer & Min, 2006).”