Reduced-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Divisive Normalization-Based Image Representation
358 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Media Technology
Citations in the corpus
- The Perception-Distortion Tradeoff (2017, methodology): “For example, [41, 43, 21] proposed a perceptual quality index based on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the distribution of the wavelet coefficients of x̂ and that of natural scenes.”
- dipIQ: Blind Image Quality Assessment by Learning-to-Rank Discriminable Image Pairs (2017, background): “Therefore, statistics of raw [4], [6], [46], [47] and normalized [48], [49] wavelet coefficients, and wavelet coefficient correlations in the neighborhood [10], [29], [50]–[52] can be individually or jointly modeled as image naturalness measurements.”
- From QoS to QoE: A Tutorial on Video Quality Assessment (2015, methodology): “In [128], an SSIM-like metric largely based on [124], [133] and structural similarity is developed.”
- Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment (2011, methodology): “Inspired by several recent successful approaches in image denoising [36] and IQA [34], [37], [38], here we adopt the Gaussian scale mixture (GSM) model for natural images.”
- Fully Deep Blind Image Quality Predictor (2017, background): “Note that local normalization has been adopted successfully in a number of IQA studies [11], [32], [33], [49] and machine learning [50].”
- End-to-End Blind Image Quality Assessment Using Deep Neural Networks (2018, methodology): “In BRISQUE [4], inspired by earlier work on reduced-reference (RR) IQA using local gain control based divisive normalization [26], natural scene statistics (NSS) are extracted from locally normalized luminance coeffi-”
- RRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment (2012, methodology): “The most successful general purpose RR quality metrics are based on computing the KL divergence between the reference and test images [12].”
- Perceptual Video Coding Based on SSIM-Inspired Divisive Normalization (2013, background): “It is shown to be a useful framework that accounts for the masking effect in the HVS, which refers to the reduction of the visibility of an image component in the presence of neighboring components [35], [36].”
- A reduced-reference perceptual image and video quality metric based on edge preservation (2012, methodology): “For the images in the LIVE database our metric outperforms the considered state-of-the-art RR metrics in all the considered scenarios, except for the case of WN, where the metric [15] performs better at the expense of a higher complexity, and the case of JPEG2000 where the benchmark RR metric [4], b”
- Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain (2012, methodology): “The generalized Gaussian model has recently been used as a feature in a NSS-based RR-IQA algorithm [21] and in a simple two-stage NR-IQA algorithm in [15].”
- No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain (2012, neutral): “MSCN(i,j)”
- Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality (2011, methodology): “Here, divisive normalization is implemented as described in [3].”
- Seven Challenges in Image Quality Assessment: Past, Present, and Future Research (2013, methodology): “In [288], Li and Wang presented an RR algorithm based on a divisive normalization image representation.”
- Unsupervised feature learning framework for no-reference image quality assessment (2012, methodology): “For RR-IQA, partial information of reference image is necessary for computing the quality measure [8].”