Seven Challenges in Image Quality Assessment: Past, Present, and Future Research

By Damon M. Chandler. 2013

460 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Image quality assessment (IQA) has been a topic of intense research over the last several decades. With each year comes an increasing number of new IQA algorithms, extensions of existing IQA algorithms, and applications of IQA to other disciplines. In this article, I first provide an up-to-date review of research in IQA, and then I highlight several open challenges in this field. The first half of this article provides discuss key properties of visual perception, image quality databases, existing full-reference, no-reference, and reduced-reference IQA algorithms. Yet, despite the remarkable progress that has been made in IQA, many fundamental challenges remain largely unsolved. The second half of this article highlights some of these challenges. I specifically discuss challenges related to lack of complete perceptual models for: natural images, compound and suprathreshold distortions, and multiple distortions, and the interactive effects of these distortions on the images. I also discuss challenges related to IQA of images containing nontraditional, and I discuss challenges related to the computational efficiency. The goal of this article is not only to help practitioners and researchers keep abreast of the recent advances in IQA, but to also raise awareness of the key limitations of current IQA knowledge.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49e569ac342e2f8f510eb4b2348803aa32f392fe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Lei Zhang
  4. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  5. Xiaogang Wang
  6. Chen Change Loy
  7. Trevor Darrell
  8. Jitendra Malik

In Media Technology

  1. Lei Zhang
  2. Xuanqin Mou
  3. A. Bovik
  4. Wufeng Xue
  5. Kede Ma
  6. Zhou Wang
  7. Xiangchu Feng
  8. Pradeep Sen

Citations in the corpus