The National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification: Origins, Development and Use

By D. Rose, D. Pevalin, K. O’Reilly. 2005

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b31fa0b500add46a44f30c6f1ac54f9c945b93f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Sarah Parsons
2. Ayse Guveli
3. Jean Ellins
4. J. Charteris-Black
5. Ann Lewis
6. Malcolm Brynin

Citations in the corpus

• The views and experiences of parents of children with autistic spectrum disorder about educational provision: comparisons with parents of children with other disabilities from an online survey (2009, methodology): “Compared with national norms of 36.1% in professional and managerial posts and 37.2% in craft, manual and service occupations, based on Census 2001 figures summarised in Rose, Pevalin, and O’Reilly (2005).”
• CROSS‐COUNTRY RANKINGS IN INTERGENERATIONAL MOBILITY: A COMPARISON OF APPROACHES FROM ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY (2013, unknown): “Both the Solon and Becker models illustrate clearly that increases in the return to education will increase inequality, and this is shown empirically by Katz and Autor (1999) for the US and Machin (1998) for the UK.”
• Understanding – and Misunderstanding – Social Mobility in Britain: The Entry of the Economists, the Confusion of Politicians and the Limits of Educational Policy (2013, background): “Where class is treated, as in the research referred to above, on the basis of the EGP schema (Erikson et al., 1979; Goldthorpe, 2007: vol. II: chapter 5) or of the National Statistics SocioEconomic Classification (Rose et al., 2005) – that is, in terms of individuals’ positions in employment relatio”
• Understanding the ethnic pay gap in Britain (2012, methodology): “Although our wage gap analysis is based on specific occupations, for convenience we here use occupational class, namely the British class schema, the NSSEC (Rose et al., 2005), which is itself based on the Erikson and Goldthorpe classification.”
• Shattering the Bell Jar: Metaphor, Gender, and Depression (2012, methodology): “Socio-economic status was categorized into three levels according to the scheme used by the UK Office for National Statistics to categorize occupations (Rose & Pevalin, 2005).”