CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement

By Mary Beth Chrissis, M. Konrad, Sandy Shrum. 2003

1,102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b1a571d119a898f77c82637862be48117569d59

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Guilherme Horta Travassos
2. F. Tschang
3. Jorge Calmon de Almeida Biolchini
4. A. Natali
5. Paula Gomes Mian
6. Tayana Uchôa Conte
7. F. Pino
8. Kai Petersen

Citations in the corpus

• Balancing the Tensions Between Rationalization and Creativity in the Video Games Industry (2007, methodology): “This suggests a similar process to the rationalization of commercial software development (Paulk 1995, Chrissis et al. 2003).”
• Experimentation in Software Engineering (2012, unknown): “The most well known is probably the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) from Software Engineering Institute 1.2 Science and Software Engineering 5 at Carnegie-Mellon University, USA [33, 130].”
• Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering (2007, methodology): “Nowadays, experimentation represents an important approach to support CMMI’s maturity levels 4 and 5 activities [4].”