Deviant Peer Influences in Programs for Youth

By Y. Kaminer, Andreés Martin. 2007

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

School Segregation, Educational Attainment and Crime Evidence from the end of busing in Charlotte-Mecklenburg (2014, background): “…the effects on crime align with several other studies of nonlinear peer effects, which find that grouping high-risk youth together increases the aggregate level of misbehavior and/or crime (Cook and Ludwig 2006; Carrell and Hoekstra 2010; Bifulco et al. 2011; Deming 2011; Imberman et al. 2012).”
Promoting child and youth resilience by strengthening home and school environments: A literature review (2020, background): “For example, Dodge, Dishion, and Lansford (2006) highlighted the difficulties of program delivery among adolescents due to the negative impact of delinquent peer affiliation.”
Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: a randomized, controlled trial (2010, unknown): “Nonetheless, that effect may be mitigated by the older age of the sample than in many of the studies reviewed by Dodge et al (2006).”
School-Based Programs to Reduce Bullying and Victimization: A Systematic Review (2009, result): “Work with peers was associated with an increase in victimization, in agreement with other research showing that programs targeting delinquent peers tend to cause an increase in offending (e.g. Dishion et al., 1999; Dodge et al., 2006).”