The Stockholm Congestion Charges——5 Years on Effects,Acceptability and Lessons Learnt
By Wsp Analysis. 2012
174 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b07f52ebdafcb9275b6f3aa0525e8d337a5a980
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- S. Cohen
- S. Gössling
- Kosuke Kaida
- Maria Börjesson
- I. Kristoffersson
- N. Kaida
- C. Michael Hall
- Susanne Becken
Citations in the corpus
- Why sustainable transport policies will fail: EU climate policy in the light of transport taboos (2014, background): “For an example of a congestion charge policy first rejected and later demanded by a majority of residents in Stockholm, see Börjesson et al. (2012).”
- Pro-environmental behavior correlates with present and future subjective well-being (2016, background): “acceptance and is currently performing better than initially anticipated (Börjesson et al. 2012; Eliasson and Jonsson 2011).”
- The Gothenburg congestion charge. Effects, design and politics (2015, background): “In particular, analyses of traffic effects have only been published for the congestion charging systems in Singapore (Olszewski and Xie, 2005; Phang and Toh, 1997), London (Santos, 2005; Santos and Shaffer, 2004), Stockholm (Börjesson et al., 2012; Eliasson et al., 2009) and Milan (Carnovale and Gib”