Community-based conservation in a globalized world

By Fikret Berkes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007

1,125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ae5327b8b0cb5e57a90cdfdeeedfab653d7cf62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Beyond scarcity: citizen science programmes as useful tools for conservation biogeography (2010, background): “Community-based conservation is not a panacea and has often failed in dealing with multiple and complex objectives, or in integrating local communities as real partners (instead of objects) (Berkes, 2007).”
African community-based conservation: a systematic review of social and ecological outcomes (2018, methodology): “…may be political, social, or economic from the local to national to access resources, build trust, resolve conflict, and provide networking, or they may be knowledgebased that mobilize knowledge at different scales (e.g., NGOs, county and state governments, universities, and others) (Berkes 2007).”
Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. (2009, background): “When the roles of these partners are teased apart, a diversity of functions become apparent: fund raising, institution building, business networking, marketing, technology transfer, knowledge coproduction, legal support, infrastructure, and community health and social services (Berkes, 2007b).”
Research, part of a Special Feature on A Framework for Analyzing, Comparing, and Diagnosing Social-Ecological Systems Applying the social-ecological system framework to the diagnosis of urban lake commons in Bangalore, India (2014, background): “Yet ironically, efforts at conservation can be far more cost-effective and easier to implement in these locations, where land prices are often considerably less inflated than in the city, and where the trajectory of degradation is often recent and easier to reverse (Theobald 2004).”
Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice (2012, background): “These are the major findings from an analysis of community conservation cases associated with the UNDP Equator Initiative (Berkes 2007).”
Polycentric Systems as One Approach for Solving Collective-Action Problems (2008, background): “Smaller resource governance systems do not always have extensively developed rule systems, but those that are robust do tend to always demark their boundaries (see Schlager 1994; Berkes 2007; Berkes et al. 2001).”
Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems (2010, neutral): “Further, simple policy prescriptions to turn over resources to a government, to privatize, or more recently to decentralize, may also fail (Berkes 2007; William A. Brock and Stephen R. Carpenter 2007; Meinzen-Dick 2007).”
Future habitat loss and the conservation of plant biodiversity (2010, background): “…conservation that emphasizes cooperation between local people and formal organizations such as national governments and foreign aid agencies (Berkes, 2007) represents a possible approach that might achieve positive outcomes with improvements in local economic condition and governance…”
Public Participation and Institutional Fit: A Social–Psychological Perspective (2013, background): “For that, we need to look more closely at human cognition and behavior.”
Environmental Governance for the Anthropocene? Social-Ecological Systems, Resilience, and Collaborative Learning (2017, background): “Partners provided a range of services and support functions: raising funds; institution-building; business networking and marketing; innovation and knowledge transfer; technical training; research; legal support; infrastructure; and community health and social services [15].”
Co-management and Indigenous protected areas in Australia: achievements and ways forward (2009, background): “Further, realisation of the desired integration between biodiversity and human livelihoods and well-being requires a multi-layered approach to governance and multiple objectives (Berkes 2007).”