Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo‐endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place‐Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts

368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization and sustainable rural development (2017, background): “It was assumed that agricultural and rural objectives could be pursued through a single set of policies designed to improve the economic performance of agricultural sectors (Shucksmith, 2010; Ward and Brown, 2009).”
Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection (2016, positive): “It also reﬂects the insight that relational reach matters more for connections between territories than proximity (Healy 2004; Shucksmith 2010).”
The Uplands after neoliberalism? - The role of the small farm in rural sustainability (2011, background): “Shucksmith, 2010) to enable collective, inclusive visions and strategies to be developed, and this approach is exemplified by the proposals of the Committee of Inquiry on Crofting in 2008.”
The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland (2016, background): “Nevertheless, positive expectations of shifting the focus of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) towards the more widespread application of Leader have been tempered by doubts about the feasibility and effectiveness of doing this within the new administrative frameworks of RDPs (see Lukesch et al., 200”