Testing for Normality
By Karen Kafadar. 2003
893 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2aca8a96722f5a26b5f22308586eaec1ebbbc56b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Nasser Arghami
- H. Alizadeh Noughabi
- José A. Villaseñor Alva
- E. Estrada
- Eustasio del Barrio
- Axel Munk
- Richard A. Lockhart
- D. J. Steinskog
Citations in the corpus
- A Generalization of Shapiro–Wilk's Test for Multivariate Normality (2009, background): “See also the reviews by Mecklin and Mundfrom (2005), Srivastava and Mudholkar (2003), Thode (2002), and Henze (2002).”
- Normalidade de variáveis: métodos de verificação e comparação de alguns testes não-paramétricos por simulação Normality of variables: diagnosis methods and comparison of some nonparametric tests by simulation (2012, background): “Mais detalhes sobre estes testes podem ser encontrados em (6) e (7).”
- Invariant tests for multivariate normality: a critical review (2002, background): “for assessing univariate normality ( Geary (1947) ).”
- Finding Optimal Normalizing Transformations via bestNormalize (2021, methodology): “The bestNormalize package utilizes nortest (Gross and Ligges, 2015) to compute this statistic; more information on its computation and degrees of freedom can be found in D’Agostino (1986) and Thode (2002).”
- Testing the Residuals of an ARIMA Model on the Çekerek Stream Watershed in Turkey (2005, background): “The AD test for normality has the functional form (Thode, 2002)”
- An empirical power comparison of univariate goodness-of-fit tests for normality (2010, background): “Nonetheless, studies have shown that, even for a sample size of 1000, the percentiles of this new standard statistic do not converge to those of the standard normal distribution and exhibit asymmetric behaviour [34].”
- Testing exponentiality based on characterizations of the exponential distribution (2011, background): “The goodness-of-fit tests have been discussed by many authors including D’Agostino and Stephens [1], Huber-Carol et al. [2], Li and Papadopoulos [3], Thode [4], Henze and Meintanis [5,6], Henze et al. [7], Zhang and Cheng [8], Meintanis [9], Steele and Chaseling [10], Meintanis [11], Jager and Welln”
- Contributions of empirical and quantile processes to the asymptotic theory of goodness-of-fit tests (2000, methodology): “Other tests of normality are the u-test (see David, Hart ley and Pearson 1954), based on the ratio between the range and the s tandard deviation in the sample, and the ~.-test (see Geary 1947), which studies the ratio of the sample mean to the s tandard deviation.”
- A Brief Review of Tests for Normality (2016, background): “By the middle of this century Geary (1947) made this comment `Normality is a myth; there never was and never will be a normal distribution.”
- Short-Term Load Forecasting Based on a Semi-Parametric Additive Model (2012, methodology): “normality of the model residuals are tested using the AndersonDarling test and Pearson chi-square test [23].”
- The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China (2008, background): “Four cases had to be excluded from data analysis, because they showed a combination of a large number of high z -scores on the one hand and high bivariate and multivariate Mahalanobis Distances on the other hand (cf. Thode, 2002).”
- NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE A Cautionary Note on the Use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality (2007, methodology): “We have used the Jarque–Bera (JB), Shapiro–Wilk (SW), Anderson–Darling (AD), Cramer–von Mises (CVM), Pearson chi-square (PCH), and Shapiro–Francio (SF) [for references see Thode (2002)].”
- Impact of uncertainty on the optimum nitrogen fertilization rate and agronomic, ecological and economic factors in an oilseed rape based crop rotation (2007, methodology): “According to a Shapiro–Wilk test (P=0.05; Thode 2002), the residuals of the Q model were normally distributed in 16 of 19, 15 of 19 and 14 of 19 crop and year combinations for the Q, LRP and QRP model respectively (data not shown).”