NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE A Cautionary Note on the Use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality

By D. J. Steinskog, Dag Tjøstheim, N. G. Kvamstø. 2007

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d206e7972064d0981b0f875b5b5747db0a80bb1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. K. Stahl
2. A. V. van Loon
3. J. Stagge
4. L. Tallaksen
5. L. Gudmundsson
6. Gabriel Constantino Blain
7. T. Soľáková

Citations in the corpus

• Revisiting the probabilistic definition of drought: strengths, limitations and an agrometeorological adaptation (2012, methodology): “Since the parameters of the GEV were estimated using all available data, the KolmogorovSmirnov/Lilliefors test (KS-L) were used to verify the fit of the EA datasets to the aforementioned parametric distribution (Steinskog et al., 2007; Vlcek and Huth, 2009).”
• Response to comment on ‘Candidate Distributions for Climatological Drought Indices (SPI and SPEI)’ (2016, background): “However, both tests are applicable if the critical values are determined for the specific case (Crutcher, 1975; Steinskog et al., 2007).”